Algorithmic Pricing Practices and Fair Competition in Online Markets: A Study of Implementation and Regulatory Challenges

  • Hindiana Sava Husada Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Syariah Alifa Pringsewu, Indonesia
Keywords: Algorithmic Pricing Practices, Online Markets, Regulation

Abstract

The increasing adoption of algorithmic pricing in online markets has transformed pricing strategies by enabling businesses to adjust prices dynamically based on real-time data and market conditions. While these technologies improve operational efficiency and market responsiveness, they also raise significant competition law concerns, particularly regarding the potential for tacit collusion facilitated by pricing algorithms. Despite these emerging risks, existing competition regulations do not specifically govern the use of algorithmic pricing, creating regulatory uncertainty and enforcement challenges. This study employs a qualitative socio-legal approach through literature review, interviews, and direct observation to examine the legal implications of algorithmic pricing practices in online markets. The findings reveal that although the use of pricing algorithms has become increasingly prevalent, legal awareness among stakeholders remains limited. Furthermore, current regulatory frameworks are insufficient to address the unique characteristics of algorithm-driven pricing, making effective oversight and enforcement difficult. This study contributes to the existing literature by identifying the regulatory gaps surrounding algorithmic pricing and proposing a legal framework that emphasizes algorithm-specific regulation, enhanced supervisory capacity, and transparency obligations for business actors and digital platforms. These findings provide practical recommendations for policymakers seeking to balance technological innovation with fair market competition in the digital economy.

References

Abadi, H. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Pustaka Ilmu.

Allbright, G. J. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Pricing Algorithms (Algoritma Penerapan Harga) Terhadap Tindakan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat [Universitas Brawijaya]. https://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/195765/2/Galen Jusac Allbright.pdf

Angterina, Tan, D., & Sudirman, L. (2024). Analisa Risiko Dan Potensi Regulasi Anti-Trust Untuk Sharing Platform AIRBNB. Jurnal Hukum To-Ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur Dan Melindungi Masyarakat, 10(3).

Dewi, R., Setiawan, A., Indra, L. S., Cahyadi, G. E., Diva, U. B., & Purba, B. C. (2025). Analisis Praktik Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat di Platform Digital E-Commerce di Indonesia: Tinjauan Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum Dan Ilmu Sosial, 3(3).

Herman, K., Hartati, T., Amrullah, & Kristiani, E. (2025). Urgensi Reformasi Kebijakan Mengenai Persaingan Usaha Dalam Pasar Digital. Jurnal Retentum, 07(01).

Hsb, N. L., Qinvi, N. U., & Nabila, Q. A. (2025). Rekonstruksi Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Terhadap Dominasi Pasar Dalam Ekonomi Digital Di Indonesia. Opinia De Journal, 5(2), 71–84.

Kennedy, A. (2024). Analisis Hukum Persaingan Usaha Platform Marketplace Online Pada Era Ekonomi Digital. Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary, 2(4).

Latifah, A., Husen, L. O., & Jasmaniar. (2025). Analisis Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat di Era Bisnis Berbasis Digital. Legal Dialogica, 1(1), 1–18.

Lo, A., & Chen, N. E. (2025). Monopoli Digital dalam Persaingan Usaha: Evaluasi Penegakan Hukum oleh KPPU dalam Menanggulangi Dominasi Pasar di Era Platform Ekonomi. Anthology: Inside Intellectual Property Rights, 3(2), 585–596. https://ojs.uph.edu/index.php/Anthology/article/view/10097

Moelong, L. J. (2002). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Saryana, Tumangkar, T., Utomo, D. T. B., Anggraeni, M., & Munira. (2024). Penerapan Hukum Anti Monopoli Dalam Menjaga Persaingan Usaha Yang Sehat. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 7(1), 4090–4095.

Setiawan, C., Sabrina, D., Amelia, P., Kristianto, F., Christabella, K. S., Yusiani, R., Purba, A. M. K. M., & Nadya. (2024). Pengawasan Persaingan Usaha dalam Ekosistem Ekonomi Digital: Tantangan dan Implikasi Regulasi. Jurnal Indovisi, 6(3), 21–30.

Solihin, B. (2019). Konsep Mekanisme Pasar dan Persaingan Harga dalam Islam. Al-Mujaddid: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Agama, 1(2), 25–34.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Alvabeta.

Thahir, Y. M. (2025). E-Commerce dan Praktek Keadilan Ekonomi: Perspektif Syariah terhadap Persaingan Usaha. Rechtsnormen: Komunikasi Dan Informasi Hukum, 4(1).

Utami, D., & Suyatno. (2025). Predatory Pricing Di Pasar Ritel Online Indonesia: Studi Kasus Praktik Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Oleh Platform E-Commerce Besar. JICN: Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara, 2(4).

Published
2025-09-30
How to Cite
[1]
H. S. Husada, “Algorithmic Pricing Practices and Fair Competition in Online Markets: A Study of Implementation and Regulatory Challenges”, IJoASER, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 543-551, Sep. 2025.