Development of a Job Satisfaction Model Using Soft System Methodology (SSM) Analysis at the Jakarta National Police Education and Training Center
Abstract
This study aims to identify and explain the factors that influence job satisfaction, namely charismatic leadership, empowerment and respect at the Women's Police School (Sepolwan) at the Jakarta Police Education and Training Center. From the results of data processing using the SSM method, it is concluded that 1) charismatic leadership has an influence on job satisfaction in terms of realizing the pattern of charismatic leadership needed by the organization, 2) empowerment can be realized through improving communication channels (both formal and informal) which are currently lacking seen to have an influence on employee job satisfaction, 3) respect influences job satisfaction because it can clarify the definition of job satisfaction itself and make leader-member interaction more conducive. For this reason, it is recommended that agencies maximize the function of the Work Culture Task Force and hold various activities that can increase interaction and two-way communication between superiors and subordinates, as well as provide an informal space for conveying members' opinions so that the definition of job satisfaction of each employee can be more clearly seen in behaviour, so that job satisfaction can be more easily increased
References
Budiarso, Sarjono Putro, U., Sunitiyoso, Y. and Fitriati, R. (2021), “How do design parameters of firm governance affect collaboration process dimensions in professional service firms?”, Heliyon, Vol. 7 No. 11, e08431, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08431.
Budiarso, Putro, US, Sunitiyoso, Y. and Fitriati, R. (2022), "Constructing the collaborative working relationships in one of the big four firms", Systemic Practice and Action Research, Vol. 35 No. 5, pp. 679-709, doi: 10.1007/s11213-021-09588-3.
Checkland, P. (2000), “Soft systems methodology: a thirty year retrospective”, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol. 17 S1, pp. S11-S58, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, doi: 10.1002/1099-1743(200011)17:1þ3.0.CO;2-O.
Checkland, P. and Poulter, J. (2006), Learning for Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology, and its Use for Practitioners, Teachers and Students, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Checkland, P. and Poulter, J. (2020), “Soft systems methodology”, in Reynolds, M. and Holwell, S. (Eds), Systems Approaches to Making Change: A Practical Guide, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag London, London, pp. 201-254.
Conger, JA, Kanungo, RN, & Menon, ST (2000). Charismatic Leadership and Follower Effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(1), 747-767.
Devi, ET, Wibisono, D., Mulyono, NB and Fitriati, R. (2023), "Designing an information-sharing system to improve collaboration culture: a soft systems methodology approach in the digital service creation process", Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-08-2022-0294.
Ergeneli, A., Ari, GS, & Metin, S. (2007). Psychological empowerment and its relationship to trust in immediate managers: Journal of Business Research, 60, 41–49.
Grabo, Allen & Vugt, Mark van. (2015). Charismatic leadership and the evolution of cooperation: Evolution and Human Behavior.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. evolhumbehav. 2016.03.005
Hananto, A. and Septianti, W. 2010. Soft system methodology approach for designing production-based practice learning models, Journal of Industrial Engineering, vol. 10, p
Hariandja, Marihot TE, (2009). Human Resource Management, Procurement, Development, Compensation, Increasing Employee Productivity. Jakarta: Grafindo
Hellriegel, D and Slocum, JW (2011). Organizational Behavior. Mason: South-Western: Cengage Learning.
Ivancevich et al., (2007). Organizational Behavior and Management. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Janoff-Bulman, R., & Werther, A. (2008). The social psychology of respect: Implications for delegitimization and reconciliation. In A. Nadler, T. Malloy & JD Fisher (Eds.), Social Psychology of inter-group conciliation: From violent conflict to peaceful co-existence (pp. 145-171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bounty. (2015). The Effect of Superior Charismatic Leadership on Employee Trust and Job Satisfaction with Respect as a Moderating Variable. Thesis. Faculty of Economics and Business, Gajah Mada University.
Klidas, A., van den Berg, PT, & Wilderom, CPM (2007). Managing employee empowerment in luxury hotels in Europe: International Journal of Service Management Industry, 18(1), 70–88.
Kreitner, Robert and Angelo Kinicki. (2014). Organizational behavior. Edition 9. Book 1. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Lawler, EE, Mohrman, SA, & Benson, G. (2001). Organizing for high performance: Employee involvement, TQM, reengineering, and knowledge management in the fortune 1000: San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mathis Robert L. and John H. Jackson 2006. Human Resource Management. Issue ten, Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Mulyadi. (2007). Management Planning and Control System. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Nurhayati, Budiarti. (2006). Factors influencing the professionalism and performance of biology teachers at SMAN Kota Makassar, South Sulawesi, Education Forum. No. 4/XXV/2006. hh. 64-70.
Pradiansyah, A. (1999). Creating an Integrated Communication and HR System: Efforts to Realize Harmonious Industrial Relations, Management of Indonesian Entrepreneurs, XXVIII (2): 7-11.
Robbins, SP (1996). Organizational Behavior Concept – Controversy – Application. Volume 2. Indonesian Edition. Jakarta: PT. Prenhallindo.
Robbins, Stephen P & Judge, Timothy A. (2013). Organizational Behavior Edition 15. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Suryaatmaja, K., Wibisono, D., Ghazali, A. and Fitriati, R. (2020), "Uncovering the failure of agile framework implementation using SSM-based action research", Palgrave Communication, Vol. 6 No. 8, pp. 1-18, doi: 10.1057/s41599-019-0384-9.
Copyright (c) 2023 Dadan Rusdian, Rachma Fitriani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.