Hakim dalam Jubah Peradilan: Sebuah Studi Pustaka

  • A. Afgan Nugraha Universitas Megarezky Makassar, Indonesia
  • Miftahul Jannah Universitas Megarezky Makassar, Indonesia
  • Wahdaniah Baharuddin Universitas Pattimura Ambon, Indonesia
Keywords: Judge in Judicial Robes, Judicial Robes, Judge

Abstract

Judges are government officials who are representatives of the state, while law (supposedly) is the basis of that state. Because judges who arbitrarily state the law incorrectly or even deliberately twist it will hurt the community's sense of justice which in turn will become a source of social anomalies and will ultimately disrupt the country. Judges who twist the law in decisions, in addition to corrupt government officials, are the main factor in people's disobedience to positive law, judicial power or judicial power is the back gate guard of the state which intercepts all actions that are contrary to positive law so that violations of the law or evil cannot escape impunitively and escape the last bastion of 'justice'. The aim of this research is to find out and analyze how the concept of justice can be used as a reference for judges as guardians of the final bastion of determining justice. The type of research used is normative legal research with a Statute Approach, a Case Approach and a Conceptual Approach. The collection of legal materials was carried out using the library research method and the data obtained was analyzed qualitatively. The research results show that there are several concepts of justice that can be used as a reference to determine the benchmark for a fair court decision, one of which is the theory of justice by John Rawls.

Keywords:  Judge in Judicial Robes, Judicial Robes, Judge

References

Achmad Ali, Menguak Teori Hukum dan Teori Peradilan, Jakarta: Kecnana, 2012.

Antoon Vloemans, 1971, Politeia, Geschiedenis van de sociaal politieke filosofie, Den Haag: Kruseman’s, yang merujuk pada karya Cicero: De Legibus, 1, 2.

Aristoteles, 2013, Ethika Nikomacheia, edisi Jerman, Buku II, Stuttgart/Philip Reclam.

Atmaja Gede, 2013, Filsafat Hukum Dimensi Tematis dan Histori, Setara Press, Malang.

Bernard L. Tanya dkk. Teori Hukum. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing. 2010

Bernd Ruthers, 2005, Rechtstheorie, Munchen, CH Beck.

Bramantyo, Indonesia kekurangan hakim, kasus menumpuk, dalam; http://news.okezone.com

Darji Darmodihadjo, 1995, Pokok-Pokok Filsafat Hukum Indonesia: Apa Dan Bagaimana Filsafat Hukum Indonesia, PT Gramedia Pustaka

David Lyons, 1984, Ethics and the rule of law, Cambridge Universty Press, New York Death penalties exonerated, dalam: http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/innocence-list-those-freed-death-row

DetikNews, Kamis 19 November 2009, 15:24 WIB, dalam: http://news.detik.com/berita/1244955/mencuri-3-buah-kakao,Nenek-minah-dhukum-1-bulan-15-hari

Fence M. Wantu, 2011, Upaya Menciptakan Proses Peradilan Yang Bersih Sesuai Keadilan, Kepastian Hukum, dan Kemanfaatan, Pelangi Ilmu, Vol. 4, 1 Januari 2011, Yogyakarta, Pena Persada Desktop and Publishing.

Fritjof Capra, 1980, The Tao of Physics:An Exploration of the Paralles between Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism, Toronto/New York, London: Bantam.

Hans Kelsen, (1953) 2010, Was ist Gerechtigkeit? Stuttgart: Philip Reclam : 32 Bernd Rüthers, Das Utıgerechteun ûer Gerechtigkeit.

Hans Kelsen, 1982. Reine Rechtslehre, Wien: Franz Deuticke.

Hari Chand; 1994, Modern Jurisprudence, International Law Book Service, Malaysia.

Heinrich Honsell: “Iustitia est constans er perpetua voluntas ius suum quique tribuendi. Ius praecepta sunt haec: honeste vivere, alterum non laedere, suum quique tribuere” dalam: http//en.wikipedia.org./wiki/Nicomachean.Ethics (2014-06-17)

http://news.detik.com/read/2014/06/14/113407/2608088/hukum-kpk-mengapa-ma-tak-vonis-polisi-untuk-ganti-rugi-korban-rekayasa

Immanuel Kant, 2013, Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, Stuttgart/Philipp Reclam.

Jaka Mulyata, 2015, Tesis, Keadilan, Kepastian, dan Akibat Hukum Putusan mahkamah konstitusi republik indonesia Nomor: 100/puu-x/2012 Tentang Judicial Review Pasal 96 Undang-Undang Nomor: 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan, Surakarta, Universitas Sebelas Maret.

John Rawls, 1999, A Theory ofJııstice. Harvard UP.

Jude P. Dougherty, 2010, Western Creed, Western Identity : Essays in Legal and Social Philosophy, CUA Press.

Karl popper, (1945) 1971, “Oracular Philosophy and the Revolt againts Reasong”, dalam: The Open Society and Its Enemies, Princeton UP.

Kelsen, Hans; 1961, General Theory Of Law And State, Russel and Russel, New York Konfusıus, 2005 (2007), (dari versi Kuoyü oleh Richard Wilhelm, Oespröehe. Lun Yu) München: dtv CH Beck. Konfusius, Lun-yÏÏ.

Kusumohamidjojo Budiono, 2019, Teori Hukum Dilema Antara Hukum dan Kekuasaan, Yrama Widya, Bandung.

Niccolo Machiavelli, 1997, Discorsi: Gedanken uber Politik und staatsfuhrung Ita: Discorsi Sopra La Prima Deca di Tito Livio. Stuttgar; Kroner, 1551.

Nur Agus Susanto, Dimensi Aksiologis Dari Putusan Kasus “ST” Kajian Putusan Peninjauan Kembali Nomor 97 PK/Pid.Sus/2012, Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 7 No. 3 Desember 2014

Otfried Hoffe, 2010, Gerechtigkeit: Eine Philosophische Einfuhrung, Munchen C.H. Beck,

Ross, Alf; 1959, On law and Justice, Universty Of California Press, Berkeley And Los Angeles

Satjipto Rahardjo, 2000, Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bhakti.

Sidharta Arief, 2006, Karakteristik Penalaran Hukum Dalam Konteks Keindonesian, CV Utomo Bandung

Theo Huijbers, 1993, Filsafat Hukum Dalam Lintas Sejarah, Yogyakarta: kanisius.

Tunas Bangsa, 9 Januari 2012, dalam: http://www.tubasmedia.com/pencuri-sandal-jepit-5-tahun-penjara-koruptor-15-tahun/

Margono, 2015, Asas Keadilan, Kemanfaatan & Kepastian Hukum Dalam Putusan Hakim, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.

Published
2024-01-25
Abstract viewed = 22 times
PDF downloaded = 21 times