Penyelesaian Perkara Pencemaran Nama Baik Secara Restorative Justice
Abstract
The legal certainty of the ITE Law related to the settlement of criminal defamation cases today can be resolved through the Restorative Justice approach or general justice through the court process. The concept of the restorative justice approach emphasizes the approach to the conditions for creating justice and balance for the perpetrators of the crime and the victims themselves. In criminal defamation through social media, the implementation of the ultimum remedium principle needs to be maximized, because basically the loss lies in the reputation, so that with the restorative justice approach, compensation suffered by the victim can be formulated with the restoration of dignity and honor properly and correctly. This research is a normative research that uses legal and non-legal materials as data sources and the approach taken is the statutory regulatory approach and the conceptual approach. To find out how Indonesian positive law regulates restorative justice, a comprehensive study of related regulations is needed. The results of this study confirm that the restorative justice approach can balance the protection of a person's dignity and honor and protection of freedom of expression or prevent criminalization of defamation cases.
References
Ahmed, Eliza, dan Valerie Braithwaite. 2004. “Shame Management through Reintegration.” Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489060.
Bazemore, Gordon, dan Mara Schiff. 2005. “Juvenile Justice Reform and Restorative Justice: Building Theory and Policy from Practice.” Willan Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843925004.
Braithwaite, John. 2002. Restorative Justice & Responsive Regulation. Oxford University Press.
Clamp, Kerry, dan Jonathan Doak. 2012. “More than Words: Restorative Justice Concepts in Transitional Justice Settings.” International Criminal Law Review 12 (3): 339–60. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01203003.
Daly, Kathleen. 2006. “Restorative Justice: The Real Story.” Punishment and Society 4 (1): 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474505048139.
Gavrielides, Theo. 2008. “Restorative Justice—the Perplexing Concept: Conceptual Fault-Lines and Power Relations.” Criminology & Criminal Justice 8 (2): 165–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895808088993.
Hayes, Hennessey. 2004. “Conferencing and Re-offending in Queensland.” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 37 (2): 167–91. https://doi.org/10.1375/acri.37.2.167.
Johnstone, Gerry, dan Daniel Van Ness, ed. 2007. Handbook of Restorative Justice. Willan Publishing.
Koss, Mary P., dan Mary Achilles. 2008. Restorative Justice Responses to Sexual Assault. U.S. Department of Justice. https://doi.org/10.1037/e698792010-001.
Liebmann, Marian. 2007. “Restorative Justice: How It Works.” Journal of Social Work Practice 21 (1): 119–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650530601173535.
McGarrell, Edmund F., dan Natalie Kroovand Hipple. 2007. “Family Group Conferencing and Re-Offending among First-Time Juvenile Offenders: The Indianapolis Experiment.” Justice Quarterly 24 (2): 221–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820701294789.
Oktavira, Bernadetha Aurelia. 2024. “Hukum Pencemaran Nama Baik di Media Sosial | Klinik Hukumonline.” 27 Mei 2024. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/hukum-pencemaran-nama-baik-di-media-sosial-lt520aa5d4cedab/.
Pranis, Kay, Barry Stuart, dan Mark Wedge. 2003. Peacemaking Circles: From Crime to Community. Living Justice Press.
Samudra, Anton Hendrik. 2020. “Pencemaran Nama Baik Dan Penghinaan Melalui Media Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi Di Indonesia Pasca Amandemen UU ITE.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 50 (1): 91–105.
Sherman, Lawrence W., dan Heather Strang. 2007. “Restorative Justice: The Evidence.” The Smith Institute, 1–144. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2997291.
Suhayati, Monika. 2021. “Larangan Penghinaan dan/atau Pencemaran Nama Baik dalam Pasal 27 ayat (3) UU ITE.” Info Singkat: Kajian Singkat Terhadap Isu Aktual Dan Strategis, XIII 5.
Tyler, Tom R. 2006. “Restorative Justice and Procedural Justice: Dealing with Rule Breaking.” Journal of Social Issues 62 (2): 307–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00452.x.
Umbreit, Mark S., dan Robert B. Coates. 2006. “Restorative Justice, Reconciliation, and Peacebuilding.” Journal of Peace Research 43 (1): 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343306059571.
Van Stokkom, Bas. 2010. “Moral Emotions in Restorative Justice Conferences: Managing Shame, Designing Empathy.” Theoretical Criminology 6 (3): 339–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480612450038.
Walgrave, Lode. 2008. “Restorative Justice, Self-interest, and Responsible Citizenship.” Willan Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843925745.
Ward, Tony, dan Robyn L. Langlands. 2009. “Repairing the Rupture: Restorative Justice and the Rehabilitation of Offenders.” Aggression and Violent Behavior 14 (3): 205–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.03.001.
Woolford, Andrew, dan R.S. Ratner. 2007. Informal Reckonings: Conflict Resolution in Mediation, Restorative Justice, and Reparations. Routledge.
Zehr, Howard. 2002. The Little Book of Restorative Justice. Good Books.
Zernova, Margarita. 2007. “Aspirations of Restorative Justice Proponents and Experiences of Participants in Family Group Conferences.” British Journal of Criminology 47 (3): 491–509. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azl072.
Copyright (c) 2025 Soewiyandi Soewiyandi, Gunawan Widjaja
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
