The Use AI Chatbots in Speaking Learning at Tarbiyatul Banat Islamic Boarding School: Santri's Perception

Khoirun Nisa; Budik Kusworo

doi:10.33648/ijoaser.v9i1.1376

Khoirun Nisa Universitas Al Qolam Malang, Indonesia
Budik Kusworo Universitas Al Qolam Malang, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33648/ijoaser.v9i1.1376

Keywords: AI Chatbot, English Speaking Skills, Student Perception, Islamic Boarding School, Language Learning

Abstract

This study investigates the perceptions of students at Tarbiyatul Banat Islamic Boarding School regarding the use of AI chatbots in English-speaking practice. Employing a descriptive-qualitative method with a phenomenological approach, data were gathered through observations, interviews, and documentation from purposively selected students experienced in AI-assisted speaking. Thematic analysis revealed that AI chatbots enhance speaking confidence, provide a comfortable and judgment-free practice environment, enrich vocabulary, and improve pronunciation through real time feedback. However, institutional restrictions on device and internet use limit consistent practice. The study concludes that AI chatbots can serve as an effective complement to traditional learning if integrated in ways that align with school policies and cultural values, such as embedding them into classroom activities, developing offline tools, or using institution-approved platforms

References

Ahmadi, A. (2023). Menumbuhkan Kemandirian Belajar Bahasa Arab Remaja: Pendampingan Komunitas Rohis SMA di Pacitan dalam Pembelajaran Kolaboratif. BERNAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(4), 3627–3643.

Aznam, N., Perdana, R., Jumadi, J., Nurcahyo, H., & Wiyatmo, Y. (2021). The Implementation of Blended Learning and Peer Tutor Strategies in Pandemic Era: A Systematic Review. Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Science Education (ISSE 2020), 541(Isse 2020), 906–914.

Beno, J., Silen, A., & Yanti, M. (2022). A content analysis of moral values in the reading materials of English Way textbook for the ninth grade of junior high school. Braz Dent J., 33(1), 1–12.

Fathia Baresh, E. (2022). Developing Libyan Undergraduates’ Writing Skills Through Reflective Journaling: a Critical Literature Review. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 27–35.

Kankanhalli, A. (2024). Peer Review in the Age of Generative AI. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 25(1), 76–84.

Kerig, P. K. (2021). Why Participate in Peer Review? Journal of Traumatic Stress, 34(1), 5–8.

Khiyaroh, N. L. (2024). Upaya Guru Dalam Meningkatkan Self Efficacy Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Fiqih Di Madrasah Tsanawiyah Al-Falah.

Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review. Learned Publishing, 37(1), 4–12.

Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2021). How does online peer feedback improve argumentative essay writing and learning? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(2), 195–206.

Lefebvre, C., & Duffy, S. (2021). Peer review of searches for studies for health technology assessments, systematic reviews, and other evidence syntheses. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 37(1), 2021.

Man, D., Kong, B., & Chau, M. H. (2022). Developing Student Feedback Literacy Through Peer Review Training. RELC Journal, February.

Mavrogenis, A. F., & Scarlat, M. M. (2023). Quality peer review is mandatory for scientific journals: ethical constraints, computers, and progress of communication with the reviewers of International Orthopaedics. International Orthopaedics, 47(3), 605–609.

Morris, J., & Kidd, J. (2016). Teaching students to give and to receive: Improving interdisciplinary writing through peer review. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1633.