Digital Financial Management Systems in Public Elementary Schools: Enhancing Transparency and Stakeholder Trust
Abstract
This study aims to examine how digital financial management systems shape transparency, accountability, and stakeholder trust in public elementary schools. A qualitative single-case study design was employed. Data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews with six purposively selected informants (the principal, treasurer, system administrator, school committee chair, a parent representative, and the school supervisor) and through analysis of official documents generated by the school activity and budget plan application (ARKAS) and the school procurement information system (SIPLah). Data were analysed thematically and validated through source and technique triangulation. The results show that digitalisation operates through two complementary pathways. The process pathway reduces manual workload, prevents input errors and duplicate receipts through system validation, and supports data-based budget allocation. The disclosure pathway produces itemised reports, standardised budget codification, and procurement records with explicit tax components that committee members, parents, and supervisors can verify. Document analysis confirmed traceability between budget lines and purchase orders, as illustrated by a tarpaulin item recorded identically in ARKAS and SIPLah. Informants reported higher trust, stronger committee support, and simpler audits, while server downtime, power outages, and sudden application updates remained constraints. The study implies that digital systems strengthen trust when they are combined with active disclosure to stakeholders rather than treated as reporting tools for government alone; education offices should therefore invest in infrastructure resilience, operator capacity, and committee-facing reporting practices.
References
Adam, I., & Fazekas, M. (2021). Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption? A review of the state of evidence. Information Economics and Policy, 57, 100950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2021.100950
Agostino, D., Saliterer, I., & Steccolini, I. (2022). Digitalization, accounting and accountability: A literature review and reflections on future research in public services. Financial Accountability & Management, 38(2), 152–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12301
Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051
Al Amin, Darwanis, & Yusmita, F. (2023). Factors affecting fraudulent management of School Operational Assistance (BOS) funds at public high schools. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Kontemporer, 15(2), 162–173. https://doi.org/10.23969/jrak.v15i2.6631
Alessandro, M., Cardinale Lagomarsino, B., Scartascini, C., Streb, J., & Torrealday, J. (2021). Transparency and trust in government: Evidence from a survey experiment. World Development, 138, 105223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105223
Bauhr, M., & Carlitz, R. (2021). When does transparency improve public services? Street-level discretion, information, and targeting. Public Administration, 99(3), 500–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12693
Bracci, E. (2023). The loopholes of algorithmic public services: An “intelligent” accountability research agenda. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 36(2), 739–763. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2022-5856
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2022). Stakeholder theory, strategy, and organization: Past, present, and future. Strategic Organization, 20(4), 797–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270221127628
Gkrimpizi, T., Peristeras, V., & Magnisalis, I. (2023). Classification of barriers to digital transformation in higher education institutions: Systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 13(7), 746. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070746
Granić, A. (2022). Educational technology adoption: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 9725–9744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10951-7
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Herkes, F., Leistikow, I., Verkroost, J., de Vries, F., & Zijlstra, W. G. (2021). Can decision transparency increase citizen trust in regulatory agencies? Evidence from a representative survey experiment. Regulation & Governance, 15(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12278
Hamzah, N. H., Nasir, M. K. M., & Wahab, J. A. (2021). The effects of principals' digital leadership on teachers' digital teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 8(2), 216–221. https://www.asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/article/view/2931
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
Karakose, T., Polat, H., & Papadakis, S. (2021). Examining teachers' perspectives on school principals' digital leadership roles and technology capabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(23), 13448. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313448
Karakose, T., Kocabas, I., Yirci, R., Papadakis, S., Ozdemir, T. Y., & Demirkol, M. (2022). The development and evolution of digital leadership: A bibliometric mapping approach-based study. Sustainability, 14(23), 16171. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316171
Lnenicka, M., & Nikiforova, A. (2021). Transparency-by-design: What is the role of open data portals? Telematics and Informatics, 61, 101605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101605
Lyra, M. S., Damásio, B., Pinheiro, F. L., & Bacao, F. (2022). Fraud, corruption, and collusion in public procurement activities, a systematic literature review on data-driven methods. Applied Network Science, 7, 83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-022-00523-6
Maisyarah, R. (2026). Digital budget transparency and perceived budget credibility: Technocratic and normative mechanisms in Indonesian local governments. Public and Municipal Finance, 15(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.21511/pmf.15(1).2026.04
Mandinach, E. B., & Schildkamp, K. (2021). Misconceptions about data-based decision making in education: An exploration of the literature. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 69, 100842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100842
Matheus, R., Janssen, M., & Janowski, T. (2021). Design principles for creating digital transparency in government. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), 101550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101550
Mattei, G., Grossi, G., & Guthrie, J. (2021). Exploring past, present and future trends in public sector auditing research: A literature review. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(7), 94–134. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-09-2020-1008
Mohamed Hashim, M. A., Tlemsani, I., & Matthews, R. (2022). Higher education strategy in digital transformation. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 3171–3195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10739-1
Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a qualitative document analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044
Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789
Niedlich, S., Kallfaß, A., Pohle, S., & Bormann, I. (2021). A comprehensive view of trust in education: Conclusions from a systematic literature review. Review of Education, 9(1), 124–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3239
Paranata, A. (2025). A systematic literature review of anti-corruption policy: A future research agenda in Indonesia. Public Organization Review, 25(3), 1181–1214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-025-00847-8
Pettersson, F. (2021). Understanding digitalization and educational change in school by means of activity theory and the levels of learning concept. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10239-8
Priya, A. (2021). Case study methodology of qualitative research: Key attributes and navigating the conundrums in its application. Sociological Bulletin, 70(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920970318
Reknaningsih, E., Nurkolis, & Prayito, M. (2026). From manual to modern: Integrating e-budgeting and e-reporting for efficient school fund management. Al-Tanzim: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 10(3), 794–808. https://doi.org/10.33650/al-tanzim.v10i3.13521
Rodríguez-Abitia, G., & Bribiesca-Correa, G. (2021). Assessing digital transformation in universities. Future Internet, 13(2), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13020052
Schmidthuber, L., Ingrams, A., & Hilgers, D. (2021). Government openness and public trust: The mediating role of democratic capacity. Public Administration Review, 81(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13298
Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Villagrá Sobrino, S., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., Martínez Monés, A., & Ioannou, A. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools' digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 6695–6726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8
Tsharane, J., & Bussin, M. (2022). Exploring financial risk management practices in selected Tshwane schools. South African Journal of Education, 42(Suppl. 1), S1–S9. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v42ns1a2123
Zahra, F., Abdullah, M. I., Din, M., Thahir, H., Harun, H., & Ali, J. K. (2022). The role of e-purchasing in government procurement fraud reduction through expanding market access. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 6(1), 179–184. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2021.9.010
Copyright (c) 2026 Laura Paramita, Zamroni Zamroni, Hasan Baharun

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






